From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E5i6F-0000UZ-0n
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:58:19 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7IAuf73030165;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:56:41 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7IAt2uB023748
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:55:02 GMT
Received: from zg040066.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.2.40.66] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E5i41-0000vx-OZ
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:56:02 +0000
Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CC89B102B20; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:56:24 +0900 (JST)
From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] generating ChangeLog files automatically from `cvs commit`
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:56:22 +0900
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <200508161818.29927.vapier@gentoo.org> <200508180909.43822.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <4303D2BA.6080704@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4303D2BA.6080704@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1458849.P6m0EH94Le";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200508181956.24327.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 005cf98c-2cf3-4271-b315-05657976dea9
X-Archives-Hash: 70c814449389fe33f1114eb54609b408

--nextPart1458849.P6m0EH94Le
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 18 August 2005 09:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> | I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would
>
> make
>
> | it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help
> | enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking,
> | please point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other=20
> | instance.=20
>
> OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn.

Actually, it says "SW". Instead of searching up what SW meant, I decided to=
=20
look at the GLEP itself where I figured the status would be written in=20
English. It does have a status listed but apparently it is incorrect.

=2D-=20
Jason Stubbs

--nextPart1458849.P6m0EH94Le
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDBGlYxvWNPsk/ZP4RAvFOAJ95z3nzaMXRSLb539JI+ffcQ8CuaACgmNKT
kHoGBYT2Y1s+KGHaSDQWNRo=
=hJvX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1458849.P6m0EH94Le--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list