From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Local USE defaults
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:31:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050818163151.GC19947@nightcrawler> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4304B293.4030305@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1043 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:08:51AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> | Kind of curious about people's opinion on the IUSE default use flag
> | thing, initial syntax was (using the above example)
> | IUSE="+client server"
> | with client defaulting to on unless the user's config disables it-
> | note, strictly enabling from IUSE, no auto-negation.
> | I forgot to add this, but it's a 10 line change if people still view
> | it as worthwhile.
>
> Yes, very. Saves us from hacky local USE flag handling by naming them
> no* or adding them to profiles.
Which then raises the question of whether or not -* in a users USE
should disable it.
I say no, since -* is mainly for killing off auto-use crap and
profiles.
Note that explicitly disabling a flag (-client fex) would disable the
default use there; question is whether or not some form of -* should
exist for default IUSE; the existing -* is profile/autouse specific,
and sholdn't be reused for disabling default IUSE imo.
yay/nay?
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-18 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-18 14:28 [gentoo-dev] ebuild design issue regarding some {I need the lib and api only}-DEPENDs Christian Parpart
2005-08-18 14:23 ` Luca Barbato
2005-08-18 15:24 ` Francesco R
2005-08-18 14:27 ` Brian Jackson
2005-08-18 14:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-18 15:13 ` Lance Albertson
2005-08-18 15:24 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-18 15:28 ` Francesco R
2005-08-18 15:37 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-08-18 15:56 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-18 16:08 ` [gentoo-dev] Local USE defaults Donnie Berkholz
2005-08-18 16:31 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2005-08-18 17:16 ` Alec Warner
2005-08-18 17:36 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-18 17:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-18 17:38 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-19 7:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-08-19 11:53 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-18 17:24 ` [gentoo-dev] ebuild design issue regarding some {I need the lib and api only}-DEPENDs Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-18 18:13 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-19 0:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-19 1:59 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-18 15:17 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-18 15:44 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-08-19 3:30 ` Christian Parpart
2005-08-19 3:09 ` Brian Harring
2005-08-18 17:01 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-08-19 2:59 ` Luke-Jr
2005-08-19 5:01 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-08-19 3:19 ` Christian Parpart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050818163151.GC19947@nightcrawler \
--to=ferringb@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox