From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5Yfj-0005W8-7r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:54:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7I0qKTJ029007; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:52:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7I0nikk004383 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:49:44 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5YcB-00008Q-8q for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:50:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 30441 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2005 20:49:40 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2005 20:49:40 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] generating ChangeLog files automatically from `cvs commit` Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:50:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200508161818.29927.vapier@gentoo.org> <200508180909.43822.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <4303D2BA.6080704@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4303D2BA.6080704@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508172050.41027.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6a25c5a5-2553-4899-98cf-f2514823de55 X-Archives-Hash: cc8e41ca5198a750e9daed7d0ee4215e On Wednesday 17 August 2005 08:13 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > | I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would > make > | it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help > | enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking, > please > | point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other instance. > > OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn. it was withdrawn for the time being because it was felt that there isnt any real way to enforce it atm -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list