From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:31:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050810163146.56512462@snowdrop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508110024.57048.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1021 bytes --]
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:24:54 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings
| >
| > <mcummings@gentoo.org> wrote:
| > | (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox
| > | to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the
| > | installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies
| > | based on doc and man?
| >
| > Join in the quest to get FEATURES added to the expand list! Bug
| > #82513.
|
| Personally, I think adding FEATURES to USE_EXPAND is terrible.
| Portage features are not ebuild features. How much do you like C code
| that has #ifdef's for the compiler being used? It's the same thing.
Then please introduce TESTDEPEND, MANDEPEND and INFODEPEND instead.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-10 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-10 12:09 [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
2005-08-10 12:16 ` Jakub Moc
2005-08-10 12:19 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-08-10 12:20 ` Daniel Drake
2005-08-10 13:10 ` Michael Cummings
2005-08-10 13:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 15:14 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-08-10 15:57 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-08-10 13:19 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-10 14:58 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 15:24 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-08-10 15:31 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2005-08-10 16:06 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-08-10 16:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-10 16:19 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-08-10 17:07 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-08-10 17:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 17:38 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-08-10 18:13 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-08-10 18:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 17:45 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-10 18:25 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-08-10 18:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 18:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-10 18:54 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-08-10 19:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-10 19:29 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-08-10 20:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 23:59 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-08-10 15:34 ` Simon Stelling
2005-08-10 15:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-10 23:56 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-08-11 0:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-11 11:02 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-08-11 12:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-11 13:40 ` Marius Mauch
2005-08-11 14:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-08-11 15:33 ` Marius Mauch
2005-08-12 1:16 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-08-10 13:22 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050810163146.56512462@snowdrop.home \
--to=ciaranm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox