From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2ds9-0002SX-DA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:51:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j79Nn2xj016660; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:49:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j79Nl5SF005594 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:47:05 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2dop-0002Wi-6H for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:47:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 3534 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 20:44:16 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 20:44:16 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proper commit messages Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:47:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050808214450.2bcc6a34@snowdrop.home> <42F9342A.7000301@gentoo.org> <20050809233148.GA22098@launay.org> In-Reply-To: <20050809233148.GA22098@launay.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508091947.56015.vapier@gentoo.org> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j79Nl5SF005594 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j79Nn21H016660 X-Archives-Salt: c712a2d0-560f-4170-9b15-4d388d92b9e9 X-Archives-Hash: 23f575bd2fcd9f5a28a142d21bef6b3d On Tuesday 09 August 2005 07:31 pm, Arnaud Launay wrote: > Le Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:54:34PM -0700, Tuan Van a =E9crit: > > and for those of us (nano users) ;) > > BTW, I never understood why it was nano which is on the CD, and > not some vi... ? last i checked, both vi and nano are on livecds now -mike --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list