Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:36:18 +0000
> Markus Rothe <corsair@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > Personaly I find it a little bit annoying to write changes twise. One
> > time in Changelog and one time in --commitmsg. How about using the
> > commitmsg for Changelog as default, but if a Changelog entry already
> > exists, then write nothing to Changelog.
> 
> I'm sure you can manage to write a bash function to call echangelog and
> repoman commit with the same message.

Sure, I can and the other mail shows that it is *realy* simple, but why
should every dev write his own "script", when this could be done once
for all?

Nevermind.. If I don't provide patches for repoman I shouldn't bitching
around! ;-)

Regards,

Markus Rothe