From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E1oI8-0001mk-Ul for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:46:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j77GjLcX027144; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:45:21 GMT Received: from griffon26.kfk4ever.com (griffon26.demon.nl [82.161.57.89]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j77GggiJ012667 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:42:42 GMT Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E62FA0A581; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:42:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:42:50 +0200 From: Maurice van der Pot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Package version requiring sse Message-ID: <20050807164250.GB9883@kfk4ever.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050806141532.GA8699@kfk4ever.com> <200508070613.56501.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508070613.56501.vapier@gentoo.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.kfk4ever.com/~griffon26/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://www.kfk4ever.com/ X-Archives-Salt: bd4fe3a9-54c5-423d-bf68-ff61b6addde6 X-Archives-Hash: 0017394ffb3c50df7a0a411698bf65a7 --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 06:13:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > that's pretty retarded imho ... this applies only to x86 right ? Yes, it does. The valgrind developers are currently waiting to see if it causes many complaints to see if they can prevent multiple code paths. =20 > > To make people aware of this, I could use the sse use flag in 3.0.0 > > and die if it is not present, telling people to mask versions 3.0.0 > > and up if they have a processor without sse. I would also have to check > > the arch before requiring sse. >=20 > seems the only sane way to handle this :( Alright, this is what I'll do then. Thanks, Maurice. --=20 Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@kfk4ever.com http://www.kfk4ever.com --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC9joJMGnpIbeahxwRAhXLAJ0QrmlOCw0jb8HIANX314RF5IjAtwCgj0rA Ltwr+b3EhVb7g4STaNUQNBI= =U9TR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list