Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles

[Benedikt Boehm <hollow@gentoo.org>]

On Monday 01 August 2005 16:46, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
> > > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
> > > stable.  Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or
> > > not.  I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux,
> > > as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles
> > > are development profiles.  I especially need to know which profiles
> > > are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd.
> >
> > vserver/*
>
> Not true.
>
> vserver itself is not a valid profile.  This is exactly why I am asking
> for this information.  From what I can tell, only vserver/x86 is valid.

well, you're right... just thought it's enough to state that everything in 
vserver/ is valid ;)

-- 
He who asks a question is a fool for a minute,
He who doesn't ask is a fool for a lifetime.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list