From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dv7Q7-0008QZ-N0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:47:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6K5k0dH021022; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:46:00 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6K5h058017149 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:43:01 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dv7MG-0004tw-5S for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:43:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 1224 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 01:41:22 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 01:41:22 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA feedback Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 01:43:17 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507200132.30745.lists@seattleserver.com> <20050720024334.GA26639@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200507200537.19793.lists@seattleserver.com> In-Reply-To: <200507200537.19793.lists@seattleserver.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507200143.17137.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0426df20-0d02-40cf-a44c-a5194bee29ec X-Archives-Hash: dac9b4a31e4871ee152147bb0aec65cb On Wednesday 20 July 2005 01:37 am, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > On Wednesday 20 July 2005 02:43, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > And as I've mentioned before I'd like MORE reports of packages > > working well before they are moved to stable arch. Without those > > stable working reports I don't have any means to judge just how > > much testing has been done on a package, other than my own use of > > a package (and as such I do leave things longer than the 30 days, > > because I don't entirely trust them). > > This sounds like a request for the QA team. I tend to stay away > from most ~arch packages simply because most of our systems are > live production servers, but I'd be happy to test-drive new ebuilds > of vpopmail if it would help get new versions into the stable tree > faster. maybe ... but i think more than just the QA team needs to brainstorm some sort of feedback system ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list