Re: [gentoo-dev] init script guidelines

[Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org>]

not to detract from the discussion, but...anyone else notice this?

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:40:01 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:

> They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked
> hack to resolve the situation.  It might be better to instead patch
> the daemon in question and send the patches upstream.  Upstream
> developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've
> done the work for them... ;]
> 

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:39:16 -0400
"Eric Brown" <ebrown@magbank.com> wrote:
> 
> They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked
> hack to resolve the situation.  It might be better to instead patch
> the daemon in question and send the patches upstream.  Upstream
> developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've
> done the work for them... ;]
> 

I'm beginning to suspect Eric and Chris are the same person. Prove they
aren't - show evidence of them independently in the same room at the
same time ;)

(and being a mid-stream developer, I know *I* like working patches more
than 'fix your junk, it broke' reports)
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list