On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:22:29 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 16 July 2005 01:03 pm, Marius Mauch wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:34:09 -0400 > > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > we could care less what users do with /etc/profile.d ... the > > > point is that *only* users should use /etc/profile.d ... we dont > > > want random Gentoo developer Foo installing some Bar.sh > > > into /etc/profile.d with package app-crap/FooBar > > > > Would the following in /et/profile be a solution to this problem? > > > > for x in $( < /etc/profile.d/.default); do > > source "/etc/profile.d/${x}" > > done > > > > That way devs could install stuff there, but it would only be run if > > users added it to the .default file. > > that kind of limits the intuitiveness of profile.d ... plus, not like > they couldnt just do 'echo blah >> /etc/profile.d/.default' at the > end of pkg_postinst or something They could do the same to /etc/profile, no? Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.