From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtZEx-0000Da-GI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:05:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6FN3l31016281; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:03:47 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6FN10ts021226 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:01:00 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtZBI-000275-N4 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:01:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 7721 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2005 19:01:00 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2005 19:01:00 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/profile.d/ Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:02:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <9f90e8bf05071514597043b7bb@mail.gmail.com> <200507151841.05326.vapier@gentoo.org> <9f90e8bf0507151556fe00ac7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9f90e8bf0507151556fe00ac7@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507151902.38224.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9f761773-3794-4a8f-af53-43d56c70e2e0 X-Archives-Hash: 692d8fcf027feb1da652d5c533105bc3 On Friday 15 July 2005 06:56 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote: > Thanks... I saw that "bug" and saw that it is very old (from 2002) and > nothing was done. Did you know why? hmm, us baselayout guys have discussed it before, but i guess we've never posted to the bug the only thing we really have against it is the potential of developer abuse ... that is, we feel that ebuild authors should *never* install a file there, it should only ever contain files created by the user -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list