From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsMyE-0002zj-Lk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:46:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6CFihPE031943; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:44:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6CFfVOF008355 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:41:32 GMT Received: from agriffis by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DsMtq-0001OF-RR for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:42:22 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:41:56 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-x1222070806-64676f73656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1121182943-0369542109923-v4.0.8 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes Message-ID: <20050712154156.GF9874@kaf.zko.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <42D2705F.3080501@gentoo.org> <200507111838.55431.genstef@gentoo.org> <42D3211E.2030802@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="phCU5ROyZO6kBE05" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42D3211E.2030802@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: c2b466cb-fa67-4d03-ba2a-cd15e5aedaba X-Archives-Hash: 9ce7876085dc7622e6d875b177ace2df --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Karl, Diego has mentioned that the nsplugins USE-flag already exists and seems to duplicate browserplugin. Additionally it is more appropriate since it refers specifically to netscape-compatible plugins, which is definitely what these are. If there's another plugin format, it probably shouldn't be handled by the same USE-flag. I haven't seen a response from you regarding this. What are your thoughts? Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC0+TEJrHF4yAQTrARAhZkAKCc5pecjoup8crFqnCacGetGeNCzACffkfn 8wgHoX3vrfxxEvWN2pLAet8= =B9hV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list