From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrdaA-00003B-V5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:19:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6AFHtWj024249; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:17:55 GMT Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6AFGGnB002872 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:16:16 GMT Received: from snowdrop.home ([82.41.57.20]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:17:30 +0100 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:19:05 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO] Message-ID: <20050710161905.64c0f091@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <42D139F9.7090401@ieee.org> References: <42CF49EF.7090105@gentoo.org> <42CFE915.9070402@ieee.org> <42D1275C.1060800@ieee.org> <20050710141825.GA21742@cerberus.oppresses.us> <42D139F9.7090401@ieee.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2005 15:17:30.0920 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D86C280:01C58562] X-Archives-Salt: e98488c5-880d-44e3-aa93-024bcb0a37bd X-Archives-Hash: cf7ffdd463a2ebe3e177d6287d6cc4e8 On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:08:41 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" wrote: | Maybe as a start, the Developer's Guide can be revised to state that: | | "Ideally any bug that a fix is submitted for should be verified and | peer reviewed. It should be verified by the reporter or another user. | If the reporter or another user are unable or unwilling to verify the | fix, the Team Lead should take responsibility for the verification. | Ideally, all bug fixes should be peer reviewed by the Team Lead and/or | other team members before the bug is marked as RESOLVED. Again, Gentoo is not a large corporation or Debian. The assumption is that the majority of fixes are done correctly the first time, and this assumption is valid. Hence, the default behaviour is to mark bugs as RESOLVED, with reopening being an entirely legitimate and encouraged response for those occasional instances where the resolution was not sufficient. -- Ciaran McCreesh -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list