From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrLU2-0006jc-L2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:59:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j69JwWi4002956; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 19:58:32 GMT Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j69Jutdb011084 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 19:56:55 GMT Received: from snowdrop.home ([82.41.57.20]) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 20:58:00 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 20:59:37 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO] Message-ID: <20050709205937.68682bed@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <42D02BF0.3010207@ieee.org> References: <42CF49EF.7090105@gentoo.org> <42CFE915.9070402@ieee.org> <42D027E1.3040602@gmx.net> <42D02BF0.3010207@ieee.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2005 19:58:01.0022 (UTC) FILETIME=[82A2C5E0:01C584C0] X-Archives-Salt: b2de7768-625c-4d24-99f2-16b3f997c26f X-Archives-Hash: cd243f2bc6aa1f641be791089a5f2434 On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 15:56:32 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" wrote: | I don't think any of the devs would suggest that *any* fix should be | accepted without first testing it (under the current process). If you | don't believe me, submit it an ebuild and keyword it as stable on a | platform that you have not tested it on. The change I'm suggesting is | having either the reporter or the Team Lead verify that the 'fix' | actually works. Oh absolutely, I agree entirely that it is a vital part of the QA process that the team lead verifies that an arch developer has correctly managed to use ekeyword. -- Ciaran McCreesh -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list