From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrESh-0007Em-84 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 12:29:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j69CSgaD026618; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:28:42 GMT Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j69CR2pT000680 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:27:02 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-5-0-cust230.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.16.230]:4679 helo=localhost) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1DrEQR-0000mI-2E (Exim 4.51) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:27:19 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 13:37:07 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting build deps out from depends Message-ID: <20050709133707.7000433f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200507091408.30498@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <20050701162524.GB11634@exodus.wit.org> <200507091345.23243@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <1120910514.6495.31.camel@lycan.lan> <200507091408.30498@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j69CR2pT000680 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j69CSgbg026618 X-Archives-Salt: 4d73c0cb-3380-4bca-8dbc-a84457d6115a X-Archives-Hash: 630f1833626a5abc61cc924a5fe7b0dc On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 14:08:24 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2" wrote: > On Saturday 09 July 2005 14:01, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > And this is exactly what one of the issue for me is. =A0Now devs on > > the linux sides, need to learn bsd make peculiarities as well (to > > start with, but it will expand if this gets in as 'policy' or > > whatever), and hope to guess right when to use make/gmake. =A0BSD > > problem, BSD fixes it them self (ie some sane way that do not > > require global ebuild scouring, or BSD devs sweep the tree > > themselfs). > The solution is: use gmake, which is GNU for sure, in case we need to > use bsdmake, we'll take care of it. Alternatively, and less work for the ebuild devs, if most stuff works with either then use `make` by default (as has always been done), and if things don't work with the system's make we can change it around when we come to keyword things. --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list