From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dr3mN-0002yM-Qm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 01:05:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6913Zfd026967; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 01:03:35 GMT Received: from tiger.gg3.net (m006052.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [219.121.6.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6910L13004853 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 01:00:22 GMT Received: (qmail 10045 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2005 01:00:31 -0000 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2005 01:00:31 -0000 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:00:31 +0900 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:00:31 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on Message-ID: <20050709010031.GA449936@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050706224651.GA19853@kroah.com> <1120745893.11567.42.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050708171252.GD29606@kroah.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050708171252.GD29606@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: ccb93500-1ec9-4f33-9bed-63ff6bb9b947 X-Archives-Hash: 1b2885df7c4fc6219c0108daeabf0f2f maillog: 08/07/2005-10:12:52(-0700): Greg KH types > --- 50-udev.rules.orig 2005-07-08 10:10:24.000000000 -0700 > +++ 50-udev.rules 2005-07-08 10:11:16.000000000 -0700 > @@ -139,9 +139,9 @@ > # tty devices > KERNEL=="console", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty", MODE="0600" > KERNEL=="tty", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty", MODE="0666" > -KERNEL=="tty[0-9]*", NAME="vc/%n", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > -KERNEL=="ttyS[0-9]*", NAME="tts/%n", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > -KERNEL=="ttyUSB[0-9]*", NAME="tts/USB%n", GROUP="tty", MODE="0660" > +KERNEL=="tty[0-9]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="ttyS[0-9]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="ttyUSB[0-9]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty", MODE="0660" > KERNEL=="ippp0", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > KERNEL=="isdn*" NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > KERNEL=="dcbri*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > @@ -149,14 +149,14 @@ > > # pty devices > KERNEL=="ptmx", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty", MODE="0666" > -KERNEL=="pty[p-za-e][0-9a-f]*", NAME="pty/m%n", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > -KERNEL=="tty[p-za-e][0-9a-f]*", NAME="pty/s%n", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="pty[p-za-e][0-9a-f]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="tty[p-za-e][0-9a-f]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > > # vc devices > -KERNEL=="vcs", NAME="vcc/0", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > -KERNEL=="vcs[0-9]*", NAME="vcc/%n", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > -KERNEL=="vcsa", NAME="vcc/a0", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > -KERNEL=="vcsa[0-9]*", NAME="vcc/a%n", SYMLINK+="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="vcs", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="vcs[0-9]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="vcsa", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > +KERNEL=="vcsa[0-9]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tty" > > # memory devices > KERNEL=="random", NAME="%k", MODE="0666" I've been trying to get this for a while, but isn't it OK to omit NAME="%k" since that's the default anyway? Or is there some other idea, related to those last-rule processed things. I think it's prettier to not specify redundand stuff and only specify what you want to have *changed*. -- () Georgi Georgiev () People that can't find something to live () () chutz@gg3.net () for always seem to find something to die () () +81(90)2877-8845 () for. The problem is, they usually want the () () ------------------- () rest of us to die for it too. () -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list