From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqxHe-0004fC-Da for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:09:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j68I8Hng015682; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:08:17 GMT Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j68I6bD5025806 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:06:37 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-5-0-cust230.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.16.230]:4929 helo=localhost) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1DqxFN-0001MP-0U (Exim 4.51) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:06:45 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 19:16:31 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on Message-ID: <20050708191631.24ddff4c@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050708170645.GC29606@kroah.com> References: <20050706224651.GA19853@kroah.com> <1120744545.6560.18.camel@lycan.lan> <20050707205236.GB30988@kroah.com> <1120778544.27435.25.camel@lycan.lan> <20050708170645.GC29606@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Archives-Salt: e49a18d7-75df-410b-ab16-317323292538 X-Archives-Hash: 24fcd3289e32bc1728b4e46f03775c4d On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:06:45 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > Heh, yes. While looking in there, I was wondering if anyone would > object to splitting the udev and devfs stuff out of the main rc > script, like other parts have been split out? That way I could > bundle the udev portions in the udev package and then keep them up to > date (like the "save modified device nodes logic") ? I've been trying to get spanky to do this for a while now. If you could help annoy him enough that he actually does it I would be happy. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list