From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqfcj-0000Hu-AM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:17:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j67NGT6n012008; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:16:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j67NDehg028389 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:13:40 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqfYs-0006ML-Ru for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:13:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 31336 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2005 19:09:45 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2005 19:09:45 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping bootsplash & friends from portage Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:14:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42CDB690.3000905@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42CDB690.3000905@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507071914.22107.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: af64cc8b-676a-406b-8b56-203054a57bd9 X-Archives-Hash: 09f738e80d898b04c15b1066e5451d09 On Thursday 07 July 2005 07:11 pm, Daniel Drake wrote: > Any comments? does fbsplash work for all the same kernels bootsplash does ? if so i dont see why punting it would be a problem ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list