From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqB1r-0000Sp-4b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:37:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j66EZL47021191; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:35:21 GMT Received: from relay7.poste.it (relay7.poste.it [62.241.4.179]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j66EVhaR012803 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:31:43 GMT Received: from flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.27.184) by relay7.poste.it (7.2.052.3) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it) id 4210C3E3001B4779 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:32:36 +0200 From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] inetd/xinetd useflags Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:32:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507060017.25598@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200507061556.05417@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200507061017.31669.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200507061017.31669.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1184874.oVTuR35dKs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507061632.35032@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 451dc1ea-7b6b-40fd-9a11-c0c8777df3a1 X-Archives-Hash: 90647e73dd23bf0f122b042afc29f9be --nextPart1184874.oVTuR35dKs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 06 July 2005 16:17, Mike Frysinger wrote: > the hasq part is pointless and the insinto is bad form for a do* func It's not pointless, ignoring it will make us come back to the old problem o= f=20 dopamd/newpamd functions which couldn't be used on non-optional-pam-dependa= nt=20 packages because if someone had -pam in useflags the file wasn't installed,= =20 also if pam wasn't optional (and so pam was not in IUSE). =46or the insinto, yeah you're right. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2 Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) --nextPart1184874.oVTuR35dKs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCy+uDe2h1+2mHVWMRArDKAJ9P+BeemcJx/ml/Aje1NRA48x96nACfZuPw adD8tOPSdVv7X5Jbjbjft0U= =YWDq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1184874.oVTuR35dKs-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list