From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dq8XR-0004MH-36 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:58:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j66BuWT1032461; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:56:32 GMT Received: from mail-gw.uniroma2.it (mail-gw.uniroma2.it [160.80.6.4]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j66Bsrhk012096 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:54:53 GMT Received: from blackhole.universe.org ([160.80.216.11]) by mail-gw.uniroma2.it (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j66BtBPa030168 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:55:12 +0200 Received: by blackhole.universe.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7068DFE5E5A; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:55:02 +0200 From: Stelian Ionescu To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] inetd/xinetd useflags Message-ID: <20050706115502.GB10419@universe.org> References: <200507060017.25598@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200507051926.26393.vapier@gentoo.org> <42CB513C.300@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42CB513C.300@gentoo.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng devel (Linux) X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: stelian.ionescu-zeus@poste.it X-Archives-Salt: ad2c71a9-0a57-4bfc-b6d0-ef61eab65145 X-Archives-Hash: 3bedbc7abfa8d23a78250149c19b3248 --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:34:20PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >Mike Frysinger wrote: >> personally i'd support a doxinetd func that would check to see if xinetd= is=20 >> installed rather than go with a USE flag ... > >This kind of auto-enabling stuff is our bane upstream, so I don't see >that creating more of it ourselves is a good idea. yes, but since it's common practice to have all xinetd services disabled by default that won't hurt because the user will have to enable the service "manually" anyway. --=20 Stelian Ionescu aka fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCy8aWKa2PQ4atpm0RAj8yAJ9hoPBEx1ZrwSAyTslQpGbJCz3QrQCeLIgB /v9z0tobqG22FDwoBFSiTiM= =VADA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list