From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqBRz-00009J-LE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:04:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j66F1Qt7022868; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:01:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j66EvLSd022065 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:57:22 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqBLp-0003OX-JW for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:58:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 18096 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2005 10:54:43 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2005 10:54:43 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] inetd/xinetd useflags Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:58:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507060017.25598@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200507061017.31669.vapier@gentoo.org> <200507061632.35032@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200507061632.35032@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507061058.48211.vapier@gentoo.org> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j66EvLSd022065 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j66F1Qua022868 X-Archives-Salt: fc9f5e01-1cc6-4b69-a40f-1d953d693d7d X-Archives-Hash: e5d1adc2ceb533de36f253554b80f0cf On Wednesday 06 July 2005 10:32 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote: > On Wednesday 06 July 2005 16:17, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the hasq part is pointless and the insinto is bad form for a do* func > > It's not pointless, ignoring it will make us come back to the old probl= em > of dopamd/newpamd functions which couldn't be used on > non-optional-pam-dependant packages because if someone had -pam in usef= lags > the file wasn't installed, also if pam wasn't optional (and so pam was = not > in IUSE). that's a hack if i ever heard one you should add a 'force' flag or something ... `dopamd -f` ... making it = rely=20 on IUSE setting is just plain nasty -mike --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list