From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoS75-0008Qi-GC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:27:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j61KRBNJ006728; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:27:11 GMT Received: from smtp50.wxs.nl (smtp50.wxs.nl [195.121.6.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j61KPWlc016254 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:25:32 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net (ip51cfc8c3.direct-adsl.nl [81.207.200.195]) by smtp50.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j61KPYKT021507 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:25:34 +0200 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150861002B for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:25:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting build deps out from depends Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:25:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050701162524.GB11634@exodus.wit.org> <20050701184222.GE11634@exodus.wit.org> <200507012053.18684@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200507012053.18684@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1331918.GpMKRxYYnt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507012225.34721.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 49d871dd-ba5c-4bb0-af0b-3915d9b970c7 X-Archives-Hash: 3a8194e45a086c19209f679638f3c48f --nextPart1331918.GpMKRxYYnt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 01 July 2005 20:53, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote: > On Friday 01 July 2005 20:42, Brian D. Harring wrote: > > Err... missing the point, and proving my point. =A0Current portage > > _will_ fail because it's an unstated dependency. =A0Why shouldn't > > portage be provided the deps it needs so it can figure out what is > > needed to get to what the user requested? > > BDEPEND is not going to resolve the case Mike shown. > > GCC bdepends over GCC to compile, you don't have GCC, you can't install > GCC, you can't install anything (a part from binpkgs). > But if you put GCC in profile, no need to depend on it, you'll always have > one also if nothign depends on it and the problem is resolved. > > BTW, as I already stated on irc, GCC is a RDEPEND not a BDEPENED because = of > libgcc_s.so and libstdc++.so, so... No, it's both. You need to have a cross gcc on the compiling machine, and a= =20 runtime gcc (gcc-lib parts) on the running machine. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1331918.GpMKRxYYnt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCxaa+bKx5DBjWFdsRAvz3AJ9sa2MpvJxBxcPH8Ojq012NsiBXkACdFj3F +7UXIsFxEpHGSwjOCLJuqzQ= =xlxi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1331918.GpMKRxYYnt-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list