From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnJTm-0005hu-Kj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:02:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5SH0Y1H028600; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:00:34 GMT Received: from www.rjlouro.org (48-239.dial.nortenet.pt [212.13.48.239]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5SGvW58028115 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:57:33 GMT Received: from acme.rjlouro.org (acme [10.0.0.2]) by www.rjlouro.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC06B3F37 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:57:10 +0100 (WEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:57:08 +0100 From: Ricardo Loureiro To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project Message-ID: <20050628175708.0a2f7636@acme.rjlouro.org> In-Reply-To: <6fd8e3c050628094717b9129d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050627170941.GA1225@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at> <20050628173929.46d3c373@acme.rjlouro.org> <6fd8e3c050628094717b9129d@mail.gmail.com> Organization: RJLouro.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: Ent$qrv:cS&{)~]XCg~s^?Vs{O{A7GIlh@%cOI.V:D*nrj5gEzGP6vk=0HGl-:g@{}]s5[Z j_3G]%}`*CV!wF,&+}0ki]5:{'Cd%"JDrSfdtuu0B0KWE#FBz Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Tue__28_Jun_2005_17_57_08_+0100_NKyzUbMx/a6bCqwT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Archives-Salt: adc3b4eb-534a-4f71-86bb-ec95f68bb9c5 X-Archives-Hash: 7ca8e41a5ccb717d9653e7db847fa831 --Signature_Tue__28_Jun_2005_17_57_08_+0100_NKyzUbMx/a6bCqwT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi again, On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:47:42 +0100 twofourtysix wrote: > On 28/06/05, Ricardo Loureiro wrote: > > Also, I truly doubt that any moderator would refuse to be > > considered a Gentoo staff or anything gentoo related, otherwise > > why choose to give their free time to the forums? >=20 > Would the likes of [1] be considered acceptable from a Gentoo staff > member? >=20 > [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=3D1053530#1053530 No, that's exactly why I said a quiz should be used for any moderator, even if they are not to be considered staff or developers. And that proves why I said moderators should need to be responsible and mature. To have Gentoo internal knowledge is irrelevant for the forum moderator work, but needed for official technical support. BTW, let's make that an example and not discuss (again) that particular episode. Ricardo Loureiro -- http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x6B7C0EC0 --Signature_Tue__28_Jun_2005_17_57_08_+0100_NKyzUbMx/a6bCqwT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCwYFkJePPaWt8DsARAgH4AJ9qqOgUPdieqNX7RTUMCAXn6fYtQgCfXvz8 Z3ZXrbyQFz2t7+Ys6Amx7xo= =4SSt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__28_Jun_2005_17_57_08_+0100_NKyzUbMx/a6bCqwT-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list