From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dj326-0005il-DH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:40:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5GMdDTd020094; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:39:13 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5GMa5Gu032536 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:36:06 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so668586wra for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:36:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=shI53cB7UbO1gL/yJLLtCN0DFOaNt25MCzpp2gv0CRajOuSYCG7JEnv3nr74bBsRlLmKNb2GaejwuNomvFQlDxUS5IF9yLN8aMwavpb49173KejzE0CMZ+jjPgaKvY/y1Lz2Q+iQHisOP7GxdQwTxNmdJ4DTH1iKAtvmXmKdpHs= Received: by 10.54.44.58 with SMTP id r58mr752209wrr; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.7? ([200.158.192.22]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 14sm422842wrl.2005.06.16.15.36.05; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:36:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Rafael =?iso-8859-1?q?=C1vila_de_Esp=EDndola?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting one source package into many binaries Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:35:37 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <564d96fb0506160950b9752bf@mail.gmail.com> <200506161201.39687.caleb@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200506161201.39687.caleb@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart34972624.lZCqcbaNbr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506161935.48542.rafael.espindola@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: f097b0b7-0dc6-41c0-9600-6302adce84f9 X-Archives-Hash: d1dc3e2df0ecdf999644b263268ecfea --nextPart34972624.lZCqcbaNbr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Em Thu 16 Jun 2005 14:01, Caleb Tennis escreveu: > On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:50 am, Rafael Esp=EDndola wrote: > > Is this a bad idea or simply not the Gentoo way? > > The idea isn't bad, but the implementation is more work to maintain than > it's probably worth. > > You can, of course, always roll your own ebuild variation and keep it in > your portage overlay directory. Or, alternatively, you can just "rm > -f /usr/qt/3/bin/designer". I use the rm option currently. A overlay has the disadvantage that I would= =20 miss updates to the portage tree. > Caleb Rafael --nextPart34972624.lZCqcbaNbr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCsf7ELlrfGJ8JUHwRAhmqAJ9le6Peaf0uCciJg4zW3H/rt8uVcwCeOJ1y +QnhSUzdh5kUNDhGH42Rx9A= =27/W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart34972624.lZCqcbaNbr-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list