From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiWkh-0006O7-Kt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:12:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5FCAlq9026333; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:10:47 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5FC94O4015107 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:09:04 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07872E80C6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Intent to help with #gentoo-dev voicing issues Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:09:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42A77DF0.3030200@comcast.net> <200506151154.20545.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20050615120316.08658eee@thelair.ynet.sk> In-Reply-To: <20050615120316.08658eee@thelair.ynet.sk> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1530405.k1leZxgDGE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506151409.28919.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 802f61d8-91fc-42a8-bc0b-2077e5a292ac X-Archives-Hash: df820a5c0ffbb85a98e1149936b33021 --nextPart1530405.k1leZxgDGE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 15 June 2005 12:03, Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:54:20 +0200 > > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > It would be an easy contact point for users. The other way would > > certainly be still allowed, but it might be easier if there was a > > fixed "contact" even if that is actually multiple people. > > Just out of curiosity - what's wrong with "any active (as in irc > activity) dev" as a "contact"? Why limit this feature to selected few? Nothing, is wrong with it. It would just be able for devs to say they=20 don't want to be bothered. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1530405.k1leZxgDGE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCsBp4bKx5DBjWFdsRAj4pAJ0abdd4F3RkWS8tb6oLEsf9DPLIuACgyEpX hZJxqzWS68kUiIGiTXSCgX8= =DE4O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1530405.k1leZxgDGE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list