From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiWNP-0005zs-N4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:48:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5FBkMbX031256; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:46:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5FBh35s025314 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:43:03 GMT Received: from smtp1.stealer.net ([82.165.37.24]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DiWJD-0005kt-BX for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:43:51 +0000 Received: from sven by smtp1.stealer.net with local id 1DiWJD-0005Qp-9q for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org from sender swegener@gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:43:51 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:43:51 +0200 From: Sven Wegener To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support Message-ID: <20050615114351.GK4585@lightning.stealer.net> References: <20050613144048.GB4585@lightning.stealer.net> <1118703403.28392.5.camel@localhost> <20050615012635.GJ4585@lightning.stealer.net> <42AF9765.8090800@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mPOSj6iWmtyhwOMz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42AF9765.8090800@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 403d66a5-f05c-41c2-8391-8b9aa609c7b3 X-Archives-Hash: 8e52046c3db9f1b3098a875e861bb7b7 --mPOSj6iWmtyhwOMz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:50:13PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Sven Wegener wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > >=20 > >>I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it package.autouse,=20 > >>package.use.auto or are you set on .force? > >=20 > >=20 > > As Mike already wrote those names are too confusing with the automatic > > activated USE flags. We already had some suggestions in this thread, but > > none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my > > opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard > > term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or > > needed by the profile. >=20 > How about use.required, since they're required by the profile? Sounds good to me. use.required sounds softer than use.force but still has this "touch me and things may break horribly" bit. --=20 Sven Wegener Gentoo Linux Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ --mPOSj6iWmtyhwOMz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCsBR3AXomK8S72HoRAgx/AJ9AJoWqgZ232aar7naWUwCwhVcUlQCeMHGx Bdctm2TLCyokN3vxT0OuZtY= =Ddy1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mPOSj6iWmtyhwOMz-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list