From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiMi5-0008JD-1b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:28:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5F1RVKc010410; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:27:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5F1PpwT021470 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:25:52 GMT Received: from smtp1.stealer.net ([82.165.37.24]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DiMfs-0000Af-4C for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:26:36 +0000 Received: from sven by smtp1.stealer.net with local id 1DiMfr-0002LC-Gt for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org from sender swegener@gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:26:35 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:26:35 +0200 From: Sven Wegener To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support Message-ID: <20050615012635.GJ4585@lightning.stealer.net> References: <20050613144048.GB4585@lightning.stealer.net> <1118703403.28392.5.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2VXyA7JGja7B50zs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1118703403.28392.5.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 35d73cdc-d885-43d6-a168-4b4a120bd94e X-Archives-Hash: 6aabb14a45ff3f59f48ad52e5b3aa77e --2VXyA7JGja7B50zs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it package.autouse,=20 > package.use.auto or are you set on .force? As Mike already wrote those names are too confusing with the automatic activated USE flags. We already had some suggestions in this thread, but none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or needed by the profile. --=20 Sven Wegener Gentoo Linux Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ --2VXyA7JGja7B50zs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCr4PLAXomK8S72HoRAi5OAJ9Yn576J9dW59jHGE3AldCQRUsV8gCeMDJe YSZcLeXFZsGnUojMJxS0LOU= =o4Hf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2VXyA7JGja7B50zs-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list