From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiKCp-0004Dt-5W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:48:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5EMl6oc027331; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:47:06 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5EMjS75025423 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:45:28 GMT Received: from dsl-213-023-208-187.arcor-ip.net [213.23.208.187] (helo=sven.genone.homeip.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1DiKAd11xy-000685; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:46:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:52:02 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl/openssl circular dep, possible solution (python/perl/db devs please read) Message-ID: <20050615005202.65b6df8f@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <200506142332.15057.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20050613171829.GA25427@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200506142250.13201.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20050614211556.GA6656@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200506142332.15057.pauldv@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Wed__15_Jun_2005_00_52_02_+0200_jUOd6xG6ePOu=Th/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 X-Archives-Salt: dfa543cf-31cc-4206-9851-944829be0c04 X-Archives-Hash: 7111a6991ae829c2aa10aeeeb764255b --Signature_Wed__15_Jun_2005_00_52_02_+0200_jUOd6xG6ePOu=Th/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:32:06 +0200 Paul de Vrieze wrote: > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, > as building does not depend on portage being there. Hmm, how do you build an ebuild without portage? Not trying to defend that dependency, but technically all ebuilds DEPEND on portage (or a compatible package manager), that's the most implicit dependency of all. Marius --=20 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Signature_Wed__15_Jun_2005_00_52_02_+0200_jUOd6xG6ePOu=Th/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCr1+VWzrL1pM7SNcRAsrCAJ4wfuI3Qdx01Qc3LyqNj9KCpR0koQCeN0DE vMS3Wq1LNbXZzPV2ReAYUHs= =LZmX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Wed__15_Jun_2005_00_52_02_+0200_jUOd6xG6ePOu=Th/-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list