From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5EFJDc7010779; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:19:14 GMT Received: from adsl-70-241-109-86.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net ([70.241.109.86] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DiDCi-0000Sn-Sk; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:19:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:32:40 -0500 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-core@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results Message-ID: <20050614153240.GE15256@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-core@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050614035141.GC15256@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1118721047.874.9.camel@koala> <1118722674.8917.8.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> <1118725488.19455.5.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1118725488.19455.5.camel@pursuit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 488cff85-1cec-4c72-8df6-a1ac2aae6328 X-Archives-Hash: bfd04d6b008a140395558e72e75240ae --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lance Albertson wrote: [Tue Jun 14 2005, 12:04:48AM CDT] > Considering the amount of information we had to go through and parse, > plus the fact some of us were busy, I would say thats not the case at > all. This election so happen to hit in the middle of a large move and > starting of a new job for me. I'm sorry that I 'didn't care' because I > had real life issues to deal with. Personally, I should have spoken up > to suggest we keep the polls open longer than a week considering the > amount of material we needed to go through, but I didn't get a chance > between things. That's my fault for not addressing that concern. I've heard from a couple of people that the timing was poor, and that=20 perhaps we should have kept the polls open longer. I'm not opposed to a longer polling period, at least in principle, but I do wonder if a long polling period makes it easy for people to procrastinate and then forget about it at the end (which I know is what happened in at least one case). =20 -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCrviYptxxUuD2W3YRAuD8AJ4rGjyqUGdHo+W/Zz/vlkWVhQA/GgCfdPa5 XIKuReRWW6F+h8pj071xios= =Ao7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list