[gentoo-dev] Metastructure vote preliminary results

[gentoo-dev] Metastructure vote preliminary results

[Grant Goodyear]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 577 bytes --]

Dear all,
  We have preliminary results from the metastructure vote, and we'll
publish a more thorough accounting tomorrow.

*** Finished ranking candidates ***

Final ranked list:
Oldschool-small-with-slacker-boot
Oldschool-small
Oldschool-large
Alternative
FOSDEM
Oldschool-large-with-slacker-boot
Task-force
Keep-current
Reopen-nominations

My sincere thanks to those who voted.

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results

[Olivier Crête]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]

On Mon, 2005-13-06 at 22:50 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 22:51 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >   We have preliminary results from the metastructure vote, and we'll
> > publish a more thorough accounting tomorrow.
> > 
> > *** Finished ranking candidates ***
> > 
> > Final ranked list:
> > Oldschool-small-with-slacker-boot
> > Oldschool-small
> > Oldschool-large
> > Alternative
> > FOSDEM
> > Oldschool-large-with-slacker-boot
> > Task-force
> > Keep-current
> > Reopen-nominations
> > 
> > My sincere thanks to those who voted.
> > 
> > -g2boojum-
> 
> Could we know the number of voters and the number of people eligible?

From the preliminary raw data, I count 100 votes out of 381 eligible
voters .. giving us only a 26.24% of participation... I guess the rest
just didn't care.

Also (as an election official), from the raw data, I can confirm the
results. 

-- 
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
x86 Security Liaison

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results

[Aron Griffis]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 145 bytes --]

Following up as an election official...  The results Grant posted are
the same as I got.

Regards,
Aron

--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results

[Lance Albertson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1041 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 00:17 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:

> From the preliminary raw data, I count 100 votes out of 381 eligible
> voters .. giving us only a 26.24% of participation... I guess the rest
> just didn't care.

Considering the amount of information we had to go through and parse,
plus the fact some of us were busy, I would say thats not the case at
all. This election so happen to hit in the middle of a large move and
starting of a new job for me. I'm sorry that I 'didn't care' because I
had real life issues to deal with. Personally, I should have spoken up
to suggest we keep the polls open longer than a week considering the
amount of material we needed to go through, but I didn't get a chance
between things. That's my fault for not addressing that concern.

-- 
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results

[Grant Goodyear]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1188 bytes --]

Lance Albertson wrote: [Tue Jun 14 2005, 12:04:48AM CDT]
> Considering the amount of information we had to go through and parse,
> plus the fact some of us were busy, I would say thats not the case at
> all. This election so happen to hit in the middle of a large move and
> starting of a new job for me. I'm sorry that I 'didn't care' because I
> had real life issues to deal with. Personally, I should have spoken up
> to suggest we keep the polls open longer than a week considering the
> amount of material we needed to go through, but I didn't get a chance
> between things. That's my fault for not addressing that concern.

I've heard from a couple of people that the timing was poor, and that 
perhaps we should have kept the polls open longer.  I'm not opposed to a
longer polling period, at least in principle, but I do wonder if a long
polling period makes it easy for people to procrastinate and then forget
about it at the end (which I know is what happened in at least one
case).  

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]