From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@gg3.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of articles.xml from website
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:26:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050610032641.GA6359@ols-dell.gg3.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.06.10.03.14.33.87595@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1534 bytes --]
maillog: 09/06/2005-20:14:33(-0700): Duncan types
.. snip ..
> ....
>
> That said, there remains the practical issue of keeping links updated. I
> see a couple possibilities.
>
> One, there's the idea others floated -- note on the page the problem of
> keeping links updated as to why links aren't provided, and suggest
> searching on the titles listed, possibly with IBM DeveloperWorks listed
> specifically, or otherwise with publisher or original source acknowledged,
> to ease the search.
>
> Two, keep the links, but again, specifically acknowledge some of them move
> from time to time, list them as last verified links, and display a
> feedback mechanism (email, or web form based to prevent email harvesting,
> or whatever) prominently asking for reader link update submissions. If a
> reader says a link doesn't work and it's verified, with no new link
> immediately available, simply note that it has been verified dead and ask
> for updates. The idea here is to leave the links as well as acknowledging
> they may be outdated, but leave the work of providing updates to the
> readers.
Three, keep a local copy of the articles unless you're forbidden to.
Four, provide a link to a cached copy, e.g.,
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs.html
--
\ Georgi Georgiev \ I hate mankind, for I think myself one of \
/ chutz@gg3.net / the best of them, and I know how bad I am. - /
\ +81(90)2877-8845 \ - Samuel Johnson \
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-09 8:45 [gentoo-dev] Removal of articles.xml from website Sven Vermeulen
2005-06-09 13:24 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-09 16:35 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-06-09 16:55 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-06-09 17:40 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-06-09 17:56 ` Olivier Crete
2005-06-09 18:05 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-06-10 3:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-06-10 3:24 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-10 9:39 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-06-10 8:19 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-10 12:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Vermeulen
2005-06-11 7:14 ` Duncan
2005-06-14 14:07 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-10 3:26 ` Georgi Georgiev [this message]
2005-06-10 5:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Martin Skjöldebrand
2005-06-09 22:59 ` Alec Warner
2005-06-09 23:14 ` David Morgan
2005-06-10 15:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050610032641.GA6359@ols-dell.gg3.net \
--to=chutz@gg3.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox