From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from chaosdorf.de (chaosdorf.de [217.69.77.174]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5800PwD018136 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 00:00:25 GMT Received: (qmail 9108 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2005 00:00:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.127.in-addr.arpa (HELO celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de) (127.0.0.1) by chaosdorf.de with SMTP; 8 Jun 2005 00:00:56 -0000 Received: from lars by celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfny9-0005zz-JM for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:58:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 01:58:53 +0200 From: Lars Weiler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering Message-ID: <20050607235853.GC10291@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> <20050607214457.GH19249@kaf.zko.hp.com> <1118181395.19657.23.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <200506072311.35555.cryos@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506072311.35555.cryos@gentoo.org> X-Accept-Language: de,en,nl X-OS: Linux 2.6.12-rc5-celeborn ppc X-PGP-KeyID: 475C474C X-PGP-CertKey: BEB4 C7C4 8160 BBF4 D0FB 373F 532A 82FB 475C 474C X-PGP-Request: http://www.chaosdorf.de/~pylon/pylon.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: d4687192-305e-4e7d-82af-d8b51d0e3b0f X-Archives-Hash: e20f32eafa788737f2dc995480561240 --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Marcus D. Hanwell [05/06/07 23:11 +0100]: > I have always managed to spot (I think) the ones that looked like they sk= ipped=20 > ahead of the maintainer, but it is another reason why having a maintainer= =20 > arch set would be nice. And sometimes (or even quite often) the maintainer owns more than one arch ;-) That's something you can't do with KEYWORDS, but with metadata. I for example can test on ppc, x86 and sparc and so I do for the packages I maintain. Regards, Lars --=20 Lars Weiler +49-171-1963258 Gentoo Linux PowerPC : Developer and Release Engineer Gentoo Infrastructure : CVS Administrator Gentoo Foundation : Trustee --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCpjS9UyqC+0dcR0wRAi/eAJ92bFYAzwvxNV6AQEJX67JxkCB5MQCfbrRT MhIkoHxg6KKiPajU1nLy4C0= =zPTG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list