From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from palladium.cryos.net (palladium.cryos.net [80.68.90.219]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j57LV3Sh006390 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:31:03 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palladium.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419835D935 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:51:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from palladium.cryos.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (palladium [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13720-04 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:51:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from linux.cryos.net (linux.cryos.net [217.155.144.218]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by palladium.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441755C209 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:51:33 +0100 (BST) From: "Marcus D. Hanwell" Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:32:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506072232.36536.cryos@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at palladium.cryos.net X-Archives-Salt: d80817d8-8d07-4cee-92d7-0773da2a9a28 X-Archives-Hash: 739aada11e4e2291d45b97d92a55d613 --nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 06 June 2005 23:26, Aron Griffis wrote: > > I am willing to revert the ekeyword change if that is what devs would > prefer, but I won't make the change without a discussion on -dev, > which was my mistake last time. Your thoughts? > I also vote for alpha. I would like to see some indication of maintainer ar= ch=20 in metadata too, but in general agree with the policy of if one arch=20 stabilises then we can assume that is the maintainer arch. Thanks, Marcus =2D-=20 Gentoo Linux Developer Scientific Applications | AMD64 | KDE | net-proxy --nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCphJ0zgRsaX1BF70RAm7FAKCQtyuufK4e71uegJBOIvl2A6fwQgCgl8hw K7Brvg6UxpoxwCXQRIdB5yE= =lJKw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list