From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from palladium.cryos.net (palladium.cryos.net [80.68.90.219])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j57LV3Sh006390
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:31:03 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by palladium.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419835D935
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2005 22:51:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: from palladium.cryos.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (palladium [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 13720-04 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
 Tue,  7 Jun 2005 22:51:33 +0100 (BST)
Received: from linux.cryos.net (linux.cryos.net [217.155.144.218])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by palladium.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441755C209
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  7 Jun 2005 22:51:33 +0100 (BST)
From: "Marcus D. Hanwell" <cryos@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:32:31 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
References: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200506072232.36536.cryos@gentoo.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at palladium.cryos.net
X-Archives-Salt: d80817d8-8d07-4cee-92d7-0773da2a9a28
X-Archives-Hash: 739aada11e4e2291d45b97d92a55d613

--nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 06 June 2005 23:26, Aron Griffis wrote:
>
> I am willing to revert the ekeyword change if that is what devs would
> prefer, but I won't make the change without a discussion on -dev,
> which was my mistake last time.  Your thoughts?
>
I also vote for alpha. I would like to see some indication of maintainer ar=
ch=20
in metadata too, but in general agree with the policy of if one arch=20
stabilises then we can assume that is the maintainer arch.

Thanks,

Marcus

=2D-=20
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific Applications | AMD64 | KDE | net-proxy

--nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCphJ0zgRsaX1BF70RAm7FAKCQtyuufK4e71uegJBOIvl2A6fwQgCgl8hw
K7Brvg6UxpoxwCXQRIdB5yE=
=lJKw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1576461.2CLgaBx4OK--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list