From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j56EThBL025815 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:29:43 GMT Received: from p061198163062.ppp.prin.ne.jp ([61.198.163.62] helo=linux.box) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DfIc2-0007aJ-8f for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:29:59 +0000 Received: by linux.box (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E8FD46BA4; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:29:41 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: sys-pam category Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:29:38 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200506051622.24240@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200506051350.15778.mcummings@gentoo.org> <42A45861.5010107@b-i-t.de> In-Reply-To: <42A45861.5010107@b-i-t.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1330540.HQgX09PDAy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506062329.40880.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8ec57b2f-4867-4352-90f1-0277f32b0449 X-Archives-Hash: 9ae0be9e0ddc4dbb4357b1bf22468f8d --nextPart1330540.HQgX09PDAy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 06 June 2005 23:06, sf wrote: > I always thought it was known that fixpackages is a non-working kludge; > my portage tree/binary packages get messed up with almost every package > move, rename etc. > > If fixpackages is supposed to be working who should I assign my soon to > be regular, estimated twice-weekly bug reports to? If you're talking about remote binary packages, personally I feel they're a= =20 lost cause at present. If you're talking about regular binary packages=20 though, dev-portage@gentoo.org. I can't imagine you'd be experiencing a=20 different type of bug twice a week though. More likely you are experiencing= =20 the same bug each time and you have a good system for confirming a fix. Regards, Jason Stubbs --nextPart1330540.HQgX09PDAy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCpF3UxvWNPsk/ZP4RAj+7AJkBLUsvi4y9x8NKAsCRNcqXPBDhoACguL6G qvx+uP7QJbmEtAG5zvuxIp8= =MMJU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1330540.HQgX09PDAy-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list