From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:34:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506051934.37053@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117985871.30949.13.camel@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 854 bytes --]
On Sunday 05 June 2005 17:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
> I think they are fine where they are. Moving stuff around is a waste of
> time. Makes things more complex. Makes more work on everybody.
Sorry but I don't agree with that, at least for the particular case of pam.
The way it's now, makes my work hardware than it could be having them in
order. If I want to look for pam modules which needs to be fixed, I need to
go through a list with eix looking for them. Also two similar modules like
pam_ssh and pam_ssh_agent are respectively in app-crypt and sys-libs.
And sorry, I don't think that everytime I need to find out what I need to
change or test I need to do some strange query like "eix -r [^s]\?pam -o
^pam".
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-05 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-05 14:22 [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-05 14:44 ` Alin Nastac
2005-06-06 0:34 ` Mike Doty
2005-06-06 4:00 ` Alin Nastac
2005-06-05 15:37 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-05 16:34 ` Jonas Geiregat
2005-06-05 16:42 ` foser
2005-06-05 17:25 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-05 18:13 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-05 20:57 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-05 21:03 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-05 21:55 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-06 10:43 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2005-06-05 19:13 ` Jonas Geiregat
2005-06-05 17:34 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [this message]
2005-06-05 19:03 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-05 19:21 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-05 20:13 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-06 19:47 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2005-06-05 17:50 ` Michael Cummings
2005-06-05 18:10 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-06 14:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " sf
2005-06-06 14:29 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-06-05 15:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ian Leitch
2005-06-05 22:03 ` Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506051934.37053@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org \
--to=flameeyes@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox