From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j512LGI7008292 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:21:16 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DdIr7-0006l1-LJ for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:21:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 26437 invoked from network); 31 May 2005 20:54:39 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 31 May 2005 20:54:39 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:54:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200505310056.31759.vapier@gentoo.org> <200505311016.06226.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050531173808.GB10887@kaf.zko.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050531173808.GB10887@kaf.zko.hp.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505312054.58682.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b4a5cce5-abd6-455a-bb23-9e95a51ff6ed X-Archives-Hash: ee070e41e7b69e69c9c6f8404ef0f333 On Tuesday 31 May 2005 01:38 pm, Aron Griffis wrote: > Vapier wrote: [Tue May 31 2005, 10:16:06AM EDT] > > > personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others > > think we should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've > > had it for a while now ? > > I'd prefer bzip2 the three packages using bzlib have been changed to bzip2 thanks all ... this is a good example of why we e-mail gentoo-dev before just doing stuff :) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list