From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4VEFig2009081 for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:15:44 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dd7X4-0006gY-Nv for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:15:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 924 invoked from network); 31 May 2005 10:15:33 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 31 May 2005 10:15:33 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:16:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200505310056.31759.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050531134146.GA9556@dulcinea.dwc.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <20050531134146.GA9556@dulcinea.dwc.homedns.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505311016.06226.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 62373f74-e75e-4771-ba85-f9bfa6bc7ad8 X-Archives-Hash: 540ebc8c801d82e1cd085e4afe64b19e On Tuesday 31 May 2005 09:41 am, Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote: > On 2005-05-31 00:56:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ? we currently > > utilize it in gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in > > portage in the future > > Some ebuilds use the global bzlib USE flag, is another necessary? > Maybe it should be renamed? ah, was not aware of said flag ... yes they should be unified ... personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others think we should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've had it for a while now ? -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list