From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4V0t0bX003951 for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 00:55:00 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dcv25-0004TQ-DX for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 00:55:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 10438 invoked from network); 30 May 2005 20:54:53 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 30 May 2005 20:54:53 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla Bug 79337 make repoman complain if DEPEND and RDEPEND are not set. Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 20:55:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <429957B1.7080004@egr.msu.edu> <200505290232.45343.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050531005148.GB7265@exodus.wit.org> In-Reply-To: <20050531005148.GB7265@exodus.wit.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505302055.14889.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e9d7ab84-2406-4707-83ec-a20b00e5ca03 X-Archives-Hash: e323581001686b1ec01f0be20b506d89 On Monday 30 May 2005 08:51 pm, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:32:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 29 May 2005 01:48 am, Alec Warner wrote: > > > The actual fix to the bug is a minor one, a small check to Repoman to > > > make sure ebuilds have both DEPEND and RDEPEND set; and to warn if they > > > are not set. > > > > > > However the use of DEPEND and RDEPEND in the manner that they are > > > requesting is a large change and thus was brought here for discussion. > > > > i'm against this ... the current behavior is the logical default imho > > What of eclasses? Bug 58819 comes to mind... i'd be for 'fixing' the eclass behavior ... making it work the same way as ebuilds -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list