public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marcus D. Hanwell" <cryos@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505261205.40902.cryos@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.05.25.23.37.29.83224@cox.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1208 bytes --]

On Thursday 26 May 2005 00:37, Duncan wrote:
> Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org>, excerpted
>
> below,  on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100:
> > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that
> > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the
> > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least one
> > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1].
>
> [note the cross-posting]
>
> That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4?
> I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to
> that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^(
>
It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains some 
more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting proper 
visibility support. We haven't taken this decision lightly, and I believe it 
is the best option we have for a stable desktop.

KDE/QT 4 should have much improved visibility support, and I will be testing 
them once it is workable and I have a little spare time
-- 
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific Applications | AMD64 | KDE | net-proxy

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-26 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-25 16:48 [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-05-25 18:02 ` Jason Wever
2005-05-25 23:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-25 23:57   ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-05-26  4:25   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-amd64] " Dan Armak
2005-05-26  7:30     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-26 12:26       ` Caleb Tennis
2005-05-26 16:09         ` Andreas Fredriksson
2005-05-26 11:05   ` Marcus D. Hanwell [this message]
2005-05-26 23:23     ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505261205.40902.cryos@gentoo.org \
    --to=cryos@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox