From: "Marcus D. Hanwell" <cryos@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505261205.40902.cryos@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.05.25.23.37.29.83224@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1208 bytes --]
On Thursday 26 May 2005 00:37, Duncan wrote:
> Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org>, excerpted
>
> below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100:
> > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that
> > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the
> > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least one
> > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1].
>
> [note the cross-posting]
>
> That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4?
> I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to
> that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^(
>
It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains some
more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting proper
visibility support. We haven't taken this decision lightly, and I believe it
is the best option we have for a stable desktop.
KDE/QT 4 should have much improved visibility support, and I will be testing
them once it is workable and I have a little spare time
--
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific Applications | AMD64 | KDE | net-proxy
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-26 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-25 16:48 [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled Marcus D. Hanwell
2005-05-25 18:02 ` Jason Wever
2005-05-25 23:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-25 23:57 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-05-26 4:25 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-amd64] " Dan Armak
2005-05-26 7:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-26 12:26 ` Caleb Tennis
2005-05-26 16:09 ` Andreas Fredriksson
2005-05-26 11:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell [this message]
2005-05-26 23:23 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200505261205.40902.cryos@gentoo.org \
--to=cryos@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox