From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp3.actcom.co.il (mx3.actcom.co.il [192.114.47.65]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4Q4Q5Bl029212; Thu, 26 May 2005 04:26:05 GMT Received: from alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (l85-130-132-31.broadband.actcom.net.il [85.130.132.31]) by smtp3.actcom.co.il (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4Q4Q2iv000608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 May 2005 07:26:06 +0300 Received: from beta.danarmak.homelinux.net (beta.danarmak.homelinux.net [10.0.2.86]) by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net with esmtp; Thu, 26 May 2005 07:36:24 +0300 id 0002068C.42955248.000012B8 From: Dan Armak Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 07:25:21 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart13152312.MHLS7epH4P"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200505260725.29929.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: da590415-cfe2-4309-aa19-91e633858c58 X-Archives-Hash: d7c25c8f7606afb884b6029034da7de2 --nextPart13152312.MHLS7epH4P Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 26 May 2005 02:37, Duncan wrote: > Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org>, excerpted > > below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100: > > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that > > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the > > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least o= ne > > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1]. > > [note the cross-posting] > > That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4? > I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to > that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =3D8^( That's going to kill it everywhere, gcc4 included. The way KDE uses hidden= =20 visibility is itself broken - not gcc. Until that's fixed, we're disabling= =20 visibility support in kde. (There was a separate bug in gcc itself which go= t=20 fixed, which may have confused some people...) =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart13152312.MHLS7epH4P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBClU+5UI2RQ41fiVERAmsIAJ9D105NTbMhuCELJyBQyUTQFWtRGACfd2Aj qahfEM4ap814n+ZhCNvt77Y= =lSoh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart13152312.MHLS7epH4P-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list