From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4MDMQib016030 for ; Sun, 22 May 2005 13:22:27 GMT Received: from weathered.linx.net ([195.66.232.37]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZqPY-0002G3-PC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 13:22:32 +0000 Received: from [195.137.15.32] (helo=localhost) by weathered.linx.net with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DZqPY-0007Dx-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:22:32 +0100 Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 13:56:13 +0100 From: Rob Holland To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] bacula needs lovin'! Message-ID: <20050522125613.GA1807@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 0596fac8-2ab9-4abf-a3d8-796a6f8389cb X-Archives-Hash: 968b17a70acc9d8c7d06225f051b7fe6 Ey peeps, Can someone please take a look at the bacula ebuilds, they really do suck and have several open bugs. Quite how any of them are marked stable I dunno. They could use a new maintainer, seems zul is now inactive. Cheers, Rob -- rob holland - [ tigger@gentoo.org ] - Gentoo Audit Team [ 5251 4FAC D684 8845 5604 E44F D65C 392F D91B 4729 ] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list