From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lakermmtao05.cox.net (lakermmtao05.cox.net [68.230.240.34])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4KLIojP016585
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 20 May 2005 21:18:51 GMT
Received: from nomad.datanode.net ([68.110.242.20]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050520211848.IQHL13442.lakermmtao05.cox.net@nomad.datanode.net>
          for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
          Fri, 20 May 2005 17:18:48 -0400
From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywording, for the umpteenth time
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:18:30 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0505201034300.4132@stargazer.weeve.org> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0505201356330.23057@stargazer.weeve.org> <428E4DE7.70905@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <428E4DE7.70905@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200505201718.30956.mcummings@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: db1cb587-5029-42fe-9abb-566c70095dbd
X-Archives-Hash: 88c5b1991fb541e50e62aa19cb2c0280

On Friday 20 May 2005 16:51, Brian Jackson wrote:
>
> Get every dev access to all the supported arches (some of this could
> probably be done with emulators of some sort, qemu or somesuch). Make them
> test on every arch before they change any keywords.

It's a nice idea (I know I recently opened "negotiations" up with the mips 
team for access so I could close some of my open bugs against them), but the 
two problems I can see with this are: remote access tends to mean you can't 
test any X related properly (shoot, I have a sparc sitting next to me 
headless, but being headless I never broach the gui related sparc stuff), and 
ultimately, that kind of open ended freedom will still result in people 
marking things ~arch and arch that they shouldn't be - maybe they rushed and 
just made sure it installed, not really worked, or they figure they can 
always go back later if they see any bugs.

Man, when did I become the dour note?

-- 
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net 
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list