From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4KDNqhJ010268
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 20 May 2005 13:23:52 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECC52E8033
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 20 May 2005 15:23:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:23:44 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <1116248680.6689.5.camel@sponge.fungus>
In-Reply-To: <1116248680.6689.5.camel@sponge.fungus>
X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLG<x1{H>q<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1866855.ES7MZbQTMY";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200505201523.52771.pauldv@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 9e1cbcc4-da78-43cd-9854-2cff9561d391
X-Archives-Hash: e5976b869541ec1fbcc88cf6058b7072

--nextPart1866855.ES7MZbQTMY
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 16 May 2005 15:04, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>
> The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
> for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
> orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
> allowed by portage.

in any case it should be _pY as your snapshot is newer than the current=20
version. _p stands for patch level, _pre for prerelease. In case of cvs=20
ebuilds patch levels are more appropriate as the new version is often not=20
known.

Paul

=2D-=20
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

--nextPart1866855.ES7MZbQTMY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCjeTobKx5DBjWFdsRAlakAKC3QjINbQCQX35yuCYpGTMXMxn7NQCcDLCX
ko/CkO5c8aGUYGRJIP33FaE=
=4QHE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1866855.ES7MZbQTMY--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list