From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outbound3.mail.tds.net (outbound3.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.93]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4IFrAgZ015371 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 15:53:10 GMT Received: from piment.flatmonk (h69-21-250-182.69-21.unk.tds.net [69.21.250.182]) by outbound3.mail.tds.net (8.13.4/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j4IFrHR2019868 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 10:53:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: by piment.flatmonk (Postfix, from userid 10208) id 34FDABA4503; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:53:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:03:43 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-970597035-70696d656e7473656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1116432243-0683211031985-v4.0.8 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ARCH keywording for g-cpan? Message-ID: <20050518160343.GD1151@olive.flatmonk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200505180556.41513.mcummings@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505180556.41513.mcummings@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 289e89af-7e7f-476b-9cd8-699f769ded60 X-Archives-Hash: 94ade051b997ee5a2429fb7f950143ae --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Michael Cummings wrote: [Wed May 18 2005, 05:56:41AM EDT] > Would you all prefer a bug with recommended tests for the new > version? Do you all even care? :) Let me know, on list, off list, For a project like this, where you wrote the code and you know there shouldn't be cross-platform issues, I'd suggest marking stable on all platforms. That is what I do for keychain. If you choose that route, you make things easier for everybody, but you also risk the wrath of arch teams if your evaluation turns out to be wrong. For keychain it has never bitten me, but it's certainly possible that someday I'll find a snippet of shell code that works everywhere except SPARC. When that happens, I'll owe an apology (and a change of behavior) to the SPARC team for marking stable without testing on their platform. If you find other arch teams opposed to this approach, then at least I can tell you to go ahead and mark stable when you see fit for alpha and ia64. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCi2dfJrHF4yAQTrARArdrAJ9V8aD4y5fdF5WHxDR+aLvpQFrihwCgzF3p 1eJQTSb+Q7CWUBJYsOFEwwk= =ZuhF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list