yeah, i hit send, then jforman hit send. sorry.


On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:42 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> (fearing the jeff wrath)
>
> can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being
> nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort
> like they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as
> resolved - make it sound like i did something rather than find that the
> same problem had been reported a few times :)
>
> On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> > Bingo, I found the correlation between those bugs and the previous ones
> > mentioned by Daniel. They have all been marked as duplicates of other
> > bugs. Therefore bugzilla does not put a "resolution" in there, only
> > marking them as status: resolved.
> >
> > -Jeffrey
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:19 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > > Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> > > > That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my
> > > > time of looking at bugzilla to upgrade.
> > >
> > > Don't think it has anything to do with age.  Just marked this one a dup
> > > this morning.
> > >
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92539

-- 

-----o()o---------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net 
-----o()o---------------------------------------------