From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tiger.gg3.net (142.13.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp [219.111.13.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4GNPVIj000907 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:25:33 GMT Received: (qmail 655 invoked by uid 102); 17 May 2005 08:25:30 +0900 Received: from 10.0.0.2 by tiger (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.85/880. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.2):. Processed in 0.305003 secs); 16 May 2005 23:25:30 -0000 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 17 May 2005 08:25:29 +0900 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 17 May 2005 08:25:28 +0900 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 08:25:28 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion Message-ID: <20050516232528.GA8290@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1116248680.6689.5.camel@sponge.fungus> <4288EA77.2030104@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4288EA77.2030104@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 748615cf-6354-4e97-a2f6-010a35d88b12 X-Archives-Hash: 0b5f6afd904d076a00e5a520102d96e3 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline maillog: 16/05/2005-11:46:15(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name > > for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be > > orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not > > allowed by portage. > > > > I can't go with just orinoco-0.15_pre20050516.ebuild as _rcX is > > considered newer than _preY. > > How about rc2_p20050516? For a moment I thought that the above may actually be valid... Good thing it's not. I would have been confused. -- | Georgi Georgiev | Oh, well, of course, everything looks bad | | chutz@gg3.net | if you remember it. -- Homer Simpson El | | +81(90)2877-8845 | Viaje Misterioso de Nuestro Homer | --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiSvofXO2NUT1EmYRAlsCAKCfx9DPUCKgMWeuEKAvg4T+kEUoaACgkLO4 2tO4K/ygfYlaiYIeneJH8BU= =eKTh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list