public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] rash of elibtoolize failures and you
@ 2005-05-13  5:00 Mike Frysinger
  2005-05-13  6:09 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2005-05-13  5:00 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

as some may have noticed, a lot of packages have suddenly started aborting 
with messages such as:
* Patching ${S}/ltmain.sh ...
 * Portage patch failed to apply (ltmain.sh version 1.3.4)!
!!! ERROR: category/package failed.
!!! Function elibtoolize, Line 240, Exitcode 0
!!! Portage patch failed to apply!

( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92377 )
( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92426 )

now, before you cry fowl [1] and start blaming base-system (keepers of 
libtool.eclass) for all your troubles, take a minute to ask yourself "do i 
actually know wtf elibtoolize does ?  or did i just add it because everyone 
else was doing it and i'm merely a tool in the toolbox of life ?"

the best way to verify whether your package should join in the lemming flow is 
like this:
# sed -i -e '/die.*Portage/d' /usr/portage/eclass/libtool.eclass
# emerge <your package>

review the output.  does libtool show *any* patches being applied 
successfully ?  *did* you remember to turn off your oven last nite ?

so if the emerge of your package displayed this:
 * Patching ${S}/ltmain.sh ...
 * Portage patch failed to apply (ltmain.sh version 1.3.5)!
 *   Could not apply relink.patch!
 * Applying uClibc/libtool patches ...
 *  Fixing ${S}/ltconfig ...                                       [ ok ]

then chances are *very* good you shouldnt be using the libtool eclass

if you have any questions, or you think your package is special (everyone 
does), feel free to pipe up now and ask for a 2.5rd party review ... i dont 
mind telling you you're wrong, really, it's ok ... on the flip side, maybe 
libtool.eclass is wrongly aborting and in that case, i'd like to know so i 
can fix base-system's broken crap
-mike

[1] http://www.timsayers.com/silly/edited/00000004.jpg
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] rash of elibtoolize failures and you
  2005-05-13  5:00 [gentoo-dev] rash of elibtoolize failures and you Mike Frysinger
@ 2005-05-13  6:09 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2005-05-13  6:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Friday 13 May 2005 01:00 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if you have any questions, or you think your package is special (everyone
> does), feel free to pipe up now and ask for a 3rd party review

to make everyones' lives easier (well just mine really), if you want me to 
review your package and you have a bug open about it, just add me to the cc 
and add a comment like 'please to review' ... that will make sure it gets 
filtered properly in my inbox and i'm more likely to pick it
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-13  6:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-13  5:00 [gentoo-dev] rash of elibtoolize failures and you Mike Frysinger
2005-05-13  6:09 ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox