From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: New category proposal
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:06:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050511190637.1160a85d@snowdrop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050511172128.GA201965@lion.gg3.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1440 bytes --]
On Thu, 12 May 2005 02:21:28 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <chutz@gg3.net>
wrote:
| maillog: 11/05/2005-16:41:37(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
| > On Tue, 10 May 2005 22:59:42 -0700 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
| > wrote:
| > | 1) Human. It's frustrating to do emerge sudo and have it tell you
| > | to specify, when there's only /one/ "normal" sudo. The /other/
| > | sudo should be vim-sudo or whatever, as you mention later.
| >
| > Silly. Then you'd *always* have to give the full name of a package
| > when merging, in effect... emerge sys-devel-gcc rather than emerge
| > gcc with emerge sys-devel/gcc as a fallback, for example.
|
| But we are only arguing of getting the categories (partially) in the
| package name only where there is a necessity. The example with sudo is
| with app-admin/sudo being strictly sudo, and app-vim/sudo being
| vim-sudo. So we keep the current names except for those that clash,
| and even there only change as little as possible.
So we end up not using upstream naming, leading to major hassle with
tarballs, major user confusion and inconsistent naming (why are some vim
things vim- and others not?). Bad! Now that portage *tells* you when you
need to be more specific, there's no problem with name matches.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-11 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-08 13:17 [gentoo-dev] New category proposal Alin Nastac
2005-05-08 13:47 ` Lars Weiler
2005-05-08 17:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-05-08 20:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal, [gentoo-dev] Alin Nastac
2005-05-08 23:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-05-09 12:16 ` [gentoo-dev] Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-05-09 13:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Alin Nastac
2005-05-09 13:34 ` [gentoo-dev] Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-05-09 14:01 ` [gentoo-dev] New category proposal Alin Nastac
2005-05-09 14:56 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-05-09 15:05 ` Peter Cech
2005-05-09 19:05 ` [gentoo-dev] Sami Samhuri
2005-05-08 22:29 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal, [gentoo-dev] W.Kenworthy
2005-05-08 23:01 ` Collins Richey
2005-05-08 23:50 ` Lars Weiler
2005-05-09 0:19 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-09 17:07 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal Aron Griffis
2005-05-10 9:02 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-05-10 14:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-10 15:05 ` Alec Warner
2005-05-10 15:36 ` Stephen Bennett
2005-05-10 17:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-10 17:34 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-05-10 17:44 ` Stephen Bennett
2005-05-10 9:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Martin Schlemmer
2005-05-10 11:04 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 3:30 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 4:27 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 5:09 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 5:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-11 6:50 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 10:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-11 10:35 ` Duncan
2005-05-11 7:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 7:23 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 10:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-05-11 15:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-11 17:21 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 18:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2005-05-11 19:01 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 19:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-11 19:37 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 22:58 ` Stroller
2005-05-12 9:11 ` Patrick Lauer
2005-05-12 19:01 ` Stroller
2005-05-12 11:53 ` Alec Warner
2005-05-12 23:15 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-14 12:46 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-05-11 7:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kevin F. Quinn
2005-05-11 8:40 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 9:01 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-11 10:42 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 15:11 ` Alec Warner
2005-05-11 15:33 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-11 17:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-05-12 11:37 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2005-05-10 9:35 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-05-16 20:28 ` [gentoo-dev] multiple categories for a package (was: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal) David Klaftenegger
2005-05-16 20:45 ` Brian Harring
2005-05-17 8:38 ` [gentoo-dev] multiple categories for a package David Klaftenegger
2005-05-17 9:14 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-05-17 8:26 ` Marius Mauch
2005-05-17 10:38 ` Alin Nastac
2005-05-17 21:10 ` Marius Mauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050511190637.1160a85d@snowdrop \
--to=ciaranm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox