From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4B8KgRg008693 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 08:20:43 GMT Received: from adsl-67-39-48-193.dsl.milwwi.ameritech.net ([67.39.48.193] helo=exodus) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DVmSU-0004rq-Be for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 08:20:46 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 03:21:10 -0500 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal Message-ID: <20050511082110.GA13132@exodus.wit.org> References: <20050510053621.GG26049@exodus.wit.org> <42805257.1090601@gentoo.org> <4280EF59.4050309@wis.kuleuven.be> <4280F817.6060402@gentoo.org> <20050511031823.GA16717@exodus.wit.org> <4281BE34.9020108@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4281BE34.9020108@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 1db7ba72-0e39-4fff-8f08-04ec4d15036c X-Archives-Hash: e241a291241b2afc42ff4680e6007d53 On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:11:32AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: > Fine, fine.... this means i can remove them as soon as i pout the new > versions in :-) I'm now going to package mask all of icc/ifc. Hmm. mm'kay, get cracking, they'll still get flagged in my script :) > > > These fetching failures are the only reason I even noticed xtv was > > gone, and the ebuilds have begun collecting a fair amount of open bugs > I've only noticed around 10, are the probably even more ? Nope, that's probably about it. Just 10 bugs, with no updates for about a year... :) ~brian -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list